What’s New at urielw.com

Be notified of updates by email -- join urielw.com's mailing list.
 

February, 2006:

January, 2006:

December, 2005:

November, 2005:

  • More Unfit News from the New York Times:

    • Phony medical testimony, or phony news article?: Do asbestos and silica suits against corporations often benefit from crooked medical testimony? Or is the Times painting a false picture for reasons of its own? And is this all-out attack on a specific doctor who's been charged with no crime warranted?

    • Expect Bolivian coca toothpaste, Times tells readers: Bolivia's front-running presidential candidate plans to legalize coca. But don't worry about cocaine, he says. The plan is to make "industrial" use of coca for toothpaste, for export to China and Europe. The Times reports impassively.

    • Prosecuting lies: Confused account: Confusing story on Austrian prosecution of Holocaust denier presents irrelevant statements from defense lawyer, plus commentary by Austrian pundits that's either impenetrable or trivial.

    • Chinese officials face-savers or killers?: Story fails to address a central issue: Are Chinese officials who tried to cover up a chemical spill face-savers or killers?

  • Deceit Culture: Imagining a logical world.

  • Times Breaches Heights of Illogic: Correspondence with office of New York Times ombudsman #2, Byron Calame.

October, 2005:

September, 2005:

August, 2005:

  • Uriel at Cambridge: Series of letters describing Uriel's stay at Cambridge University. Index shows up-to-date letter list.

July, 2005:

June, 2005:

  • Deception Shapes Public Opinion: To uphold democracy, the deceivers must be exposed.

  • A Diseased Democracy: The systemic problems underlying the Guidant Corp. scandal. (Further followup on Heart Trouble.)

  • Yet more on Irreconcilable Differences: In a single issue, the New York Times delivers a one-two punch to thoughts of communication amongst humans.

  • Followup on Heart Trouble: Medical devices implanted in 50,000 patients have now been recalled, as Guidant Corp. copes with the aftermath of having had its secrets exposed by the New York Times.

  • Heart Trouble: A medical devices company kept mum about a defect in a device that is surgically implanted within the chests of 24,000 people (as of June, 2005) -- until the flaw caused a death and the New York Times reported the story. The day the piece appeared in the Times, a doctor with ties to the company solicited urielw.com's support in attacking the "biased" and "shoddily reported" article. "In the interest of creating headlines and another NYT scoop," the doctor charged, the Times "has likely caused harm to innocent people."

  • Pundits Reach Similar Ideas Without Communication: Guest New York Times columnist Matt Miller today joins my opinion bloc. (Continuation of Irreconcilable Differences.)

  • Restaurateur's Heroism Tale Smells Fishy: Frédéric Geisweiller, proprietor of downtown Toronto's Le Select Bistro restaurant, advertises his alternate history of a legal defeat, in which he's no deadbeat but a defender of very important principles like francophone rights.

May, 2005:

April, 2005:

March, 2005:

  • Part 4 of Issue Ratatouille: Robot smackdown follows remarks on Canada; Uriel mum about President Bush's dedication to sanctity of life; and the strange connections between Uriel and novelist Ian McEwan.

  • Part 3 of Issue Ratatouille: More spoutings from Homo Rightwingus; screwups all around; special notes on Canada; and a refuge from the craziness.

  • Toronto Star Doesn't Shine: A Toronto Star story about a murderer's sentencing doesn't make sense. I emailed the reporter ... and her response didn't make sense. I emailed the paper's ombudsperson ... and he/she ignored me.

    Correspondence and published article shown here.

  • Cultural Incommensurability: Prof. Longxi Zhang of Hong Kong rebuts fallacies of unknowns; unknown author Nickolay Gurevich quotes self; and a former unknown's chronicle of China's diplomacy school is likened to Martin Luther's revolutionary Ninety-Five Theses (posted in Wittenberg).

February, 2005:

  • Two Trailer Park Moms: Thoughts on a winner at the 2005 Academy Awards.

  • Part 2 of Issue Ratatouille: On Bush lies and Homo rightwingus.

  • Emperor's Nudity Remarked: Establishment news media organ briefly tolerates glasnost with respect to Microsoft Windows®.

  • Issue Ratatouille: A mixed salad of issues: Harvard University's president explanation for the low numbers of females in the sciences ("there are issues of intrinsic aptitude"); Olivia Judson's green spoon worms; the challenges to the theory of evolution and the ironically dogmatic responses of professional scientists; the New York Times's phony attacks on the blogosphere; and an idea from Times ombudsman Daniel Okrent that is actually ... wonderful.

  • Updated exams at Uriel at LZU (questions and answers are shown) by adding hyperlinks to make source materials directly available.

January, 2005:

  • Journalism versus Capitalism: The bilious blogosphere ignores media expert Michael Wolff's insights on why the press isn't fulfilling its democratic role.

  • "Never again": That oft-heard reflection on the Nazi Holocaust is as wishfully unrealistic as the misplaced certainty that preceded it -- that such barbarity could never flourish in the heart of civilized Europe.

  • Evil not a PR concern, as long as no pix: Court upholds Bush admin actions that promote patronage. Is patronage not understood to be counter to public interest? No coherent rationalization appears. (Re "Trenton Loses Court Skirmish on Road Funds," by Josh Benson, New York Times, January 22, 2005.)

  • The World's Beacon of Democracy -- Today: Harmony, goodwill, security. We would like our children to be headed towards that kind of world. And bland safety and comfort are not enough. Their future should also bring joy, excitement, human fulfillment. But our kids probably won't even get so much as safety and security....

  • Chinese Journalist Sued in U.S. [removed]: A new New York Times failure; news report ignores central question: Does the suit have a legitimate basis? (Re "Chinese TV Director Sued by Falun Gong Claims Free Speech Protection in the U.S.," by Adam Liptak, January 2, 2005.)

PREVIOUS:

See What WAS New at urielw.com for earlier additions to urielw.com.


Home